1 files changed, 27 insertions, 27 deletions

diff --git a/pelican/content/InterconnectStandards.md b/pelican/content/InterconnectStandards.md
index 4ce1c83..3896a83 100644
--- a/pelican/content/InterconnectStandards.md
+++ b/pelican/content/InterconnectStandards.md
@@ -23,16 +23,16 @@ provide technical diversity that might be required by the
 system. Typical differences are:
 
 
-    - Performance. The capacity as well as latency.
+- Performance. The capacity as well as latency.
 
 
 
-    - Intelligence. Simple master-slave read/write access or DMA-transfers,
+- Intelligence. Simple master-slave read/write access or DMA-transfers,
    coherence support etc.
 
 
 
-    - point to point or point to multipoint. Basically bus based or switch
+- point to point or point to multipoint. Basically bus based or switch
    fabric.
 
 
@@ -40,13 +40,13 @@ system. Typical differences are:
 There are also non-technical differences:
 
 
-    - Licensing and pricing. Does using a standard add monetary cost and
+- Licensing and pricing. Does using a standard add monetary cost and
    does using the standard infer restrictions in sharing, disclosure of
    source code?
 
 
 
-    - Market share. The market share is primarily interesting as basis for
+- Market share. The market share is primarily interesting as basis for
    the availability of other cores that could be integrated.
 
 
@@ -63,24 +63,24 @@ cores and subsystem GRLIB.
 AMBA currently contains four main interconnect types:
 
 
-    - APB. A simple register read/write bus used to connect simpler
+- APB. A simple register read/write bus used to connect simpler
     devices such as timers, IRQ handlers, slow serial I/O such as UARTS
     and GPIO interfaces. The peripherals are connected to a common bus
     with a single master.
 
 
 
-    - AHB. A more advanced bus based interconnect. Supports more complex
+- AHB. A more advanced bus based interconnect. Supports more complex
     data transfers of up to 1 kByte data. Supports multiple masters.
 
 
 
-    - AXI. A switch fabric based interconnect that supports multiple
+- AXI. A switch fabric based interconnect that supports multiple
     parallel transfers, multiple masters etc.
 
 
 
-    - ACE. A low latency interconnect that supports cache coherency to
+- ACE. A low latency interconnect that supports cache coherency to
     allow the design of multicore, multiprocessor systems on-chip.
 
 
@@ -97,27 +97,27 @@ different AMBA interconnect types.
 
 Pros:
 
-    - Technically advanced and covers a wide range of system
+- Technically advanced and covers a wide range of system
     requirements.
 
 
 
-    - A huge user base.
+- A huge user base.
 
 
 
-    - A huge selection of third party support in terms of tools as well as
+- A huge selection of third party support in terms of tools as well as
     cores. Most of these cores and tools are commercial and proprietary,
     closed source.
 
 
 Cons:
 
-    - Licensing. Would Cryptech need to get a license?
+- Licensing. Would Cryptech need to get a license?
 
 
 
-    - Availability of open cores
+- Availability of open cores
 
 
 
@@ -139,20 +139,20 @@ as interface standard.
 =
 Pros:
 
-    - Good technical features.
+- Good technical features.
 
 
 
-    - Easy integration in Nios-II based systems.
+- Easy integration in Nios-II based systems.
 
 
 Cons:
 
-    - Limited to Altera based FPGA designs.
+- Limited to Altera based FPGA designs.
 
 
 
-    - Low support from open and proprietary third party suppliers of tools
+- Low support from open and proprietary third party suppliers of tools
     and cores.
 
 
@@ -173,13 +173,13 @@ number of patents related to CoreConnect (see the license agreement).
 
 Pros:
 
-    - Good support on for systems implemented on Xilinx FPGAs.
+- Good support on for systems implemented on Xilinx FPGAs.
 
 
 Cons:
 
-    - Low support by open cores and tools.
-    - License agreement.
+- Low support by open cores and tools.
+- License agreement.
 
 
 
@@ -203,12 +203,12 @@ open.
 
 Pros:
 
-    - Good technical features.
+- Good technical features.
 
 
 Cons:
 
-    - Not very common in use by open cores.
+- Not very common in use by open cores.
 
 
 
@@ -239,14 +239,14 @@ specification document itself is close to Creative Commons CC-BY.
 
 Pros:
 
-    - Fairly good technical support.
-    - Good support from open tools and cores.
-    - Public domain license.
+- Fairly good technical support.
+- Good support from open tools and cores.
+- Public domain license.
 
 
 Cons:
 
-    - Not as advanced. No good coherency support for example.
+- Not as advanced. No good coherency support for example.