Title: StateOfPlay
Date: 2016-12-15 22:44
This page contains a snapshot of the status in the project and will almost certainly be obsolete by the time you read it. If you find something that's wrong, please fix it!
We have a bunch of cores, primarily for FPGA implementation. Some of them implement cryptographic
algorithms or critical functionality like the TRNG. Other cores are support cores for implementation of the Cryptech HSM. Other cores are for developing the cores and the HW. Finally some are just test
code.
Cores that have been promoted to official cryptech HW cores:
core/chacha - The ChaCha stream ciphercore/sha1 - FIPS 180-2 SHA-1 hashcore/sha256 - FIPS 180-4 SHA-256 hashcore/sha512 - FIPS 180-4 SHA-512/x hashcore/trng - The Cryptech TRNG sub system. Uses ChaCha, SHA-512 and entropy cores.core/avalanche_entropy - Avalanche entropy provider core. Requires external avalanche noise source.core/rosc_entropy - Digital ring oscillator based entropy provider core.
Utility, test, board support:
core/coretest - Core for performing command/response operations to drive testing of a core.core/coretest_hashes - Subsysem with coretest and the hash function cores as test objects.core/coretest_test_core - Coretest with a simple test corecore/i2c - I2C interface core.core/novenacore/novena_eimcore/novena_i2c_simplecore/test_corecore/uart- UART interface core to allow serial communication with FPGA functionality.core/vndecorrelator - von Neumann decorrelation core.
Documentation is very haphazard: some of the repositories have
detailed README.md files, but in many cases the documentation, what
there is of it, is probably meaningful only to the person who wrote
it, not because of any lack of good intent, just because what's
written assumes that the reader knows everything that the author does
about the other cores, the rest of the environment, and how everything
fits together.
At this point I have figured out how to build two different FPGA
images for the Novena PVT1. In both cases, I'm using the Makefile
rather than attempting to use the XiLinx GUI environment.
core/novena builds the current set of digest cores into a
framework that uses the "coretest" byte stream protocol over an I2C
bus.
core/novena_i2c_simple builds the current set of digest cores into
a framework that uses a simplfied write()/read() API over an I2C bus.
There's a third build, core/novena_eim, which was only just updated
today, and which is reported as not quite stable yet. Will try
building it soon and report here.
Both working builds (and, almost certainly, any useful build) involve
more than just the named repository. verilator, when asked nicely,
will draw a graph of Verilog module relationships. Take this with
salt, as I am a long way from getting verilator to run cleanly on
any of this, but the current graphs may still be useful in visualizing
what's happening here.
At least some of the modules that verilator complains about not
being able to find appear to come from XiLinx libraries that
verilator doesn't know about.
See Spartan-6 Libraries Guide for HDL Designs for details.
By special request, here's a graph for the TRNG too, even though we
don't yet have a way to speak to it from the Novena:
Most of the cores have at least minimal test frameworks, written in a
combination of Verilog, C, and Python, but there's also a preliminary
port of Cryptlib to the Cryptech environment, in sw/cryptlib. As of
this writing, the only Cryptech-specific features of this port, other
than a few makefile tricks, are:
- A set of HALs that make use of the
core/novena and
core/novena_i2c_simple FPGA builds, using the Linux /dev/i2c
device interface; and
- Another Python script to test the resulting Cryptlib build, using
the stock Cryptlib Python bindings.
No HAL for core/novena_eim yet.
The Cryptlib Python bindings build kind of slowly on the Novena, sorry
about that.
The hardware guys have done cool stuff with hardware entropy sources.
I even have one of the noise boards, but until I have some way to
connect C code to the TRNG, I don't have much use for it other than to
admire the craftsmanship. Soon, I hope.
Already mentioned verilator. In addition to generating GraphViz
input, verilator has a --lint mode which looks interesting.
(JS) Verilator is fairly usable, at least as a linter. Adding -Wall provides more warnings.
Since we at least uses Icarus Verilog (iverilog), Altera Quartus and Xilinx ISE one would assume that they would provide all possible warnings. That is not the case. They all seem to fins different things to warn about. And Verilator provides even more. The more parsers and checkers the better. But we will not be able to, or want to fix all warnings. Some things are by design. We should probably document what we ignore.
I haven't yet figured out whether we have any real use for
verilator's core function of synthesizing Verilog into C++. I've
been toying with the idea of a software-only development environment,
where one simulates an embedded machine using two Unix processes: one
would be a virtual FPGA generated by verilator, the other would be a
classical deeply embedded system running as a single process. The two
processes would communicate via a PF_UNIX socket or something on
that order. It might be possible to jam everything into a single
process, but I suspect it wouldn't be worth the trouble.
Joachim has Makefiles which use iverilog to generate simulation
images. Installing iverilog is easy enough (apt-get install, etc)
but I haven't yet figured out how to do anything interesting with the
simulation images. Joachim replies:
There is help in the Makefile. You run the targets, either as
make sim-foo or just ./foo.sim. Most if not all tests are self
testing with test cases and should report number of test cases and
how many passed. Which should be all.
As far as I know we've done nothing yet to deal with threats to the
tool chain (Thompson attack, etc).
