diff options
author | Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> | 2020-09-13 23:06:24 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> | 2020-09-13 23:06:24 +0000 |
commit | 891730d13b324fad916572a82f0bd610c5de9aad (patch) | |
tree | f46c94ddfff34f15aafe7cac0596716d1c13c412 /raw-wiki-dump/GitRepositories%2Fsw%2Flibhal | |
parent | b092ffbcbe2c9398494f7dc9db6f0796971633e0 (diff) |
Rename for conversion
Diffstat (limited to 'raw-wiki-dump/GitRepositories%2Fsw%2Flibhal')
-rw-r--r-- | raw-wiki-dump/GitRepositories%2Fsw%2Flibhal | 298 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 298 deletions
diff --git a/raw-wiki-dump/GitRepositories%2Fsw%2Flibhal b/raw-wiki-dump/GitRepositories%2Fsw%2Flibhal deleted file mode 100644 index 29132dc..0000000 --- a/raw-wiki-dump/GitRepositories%2Fsw%2Flibhal +++ /dev/null @@ -1,298 +0,0 @@ -{{{ -#!htmlcomment - -This page is maintained automatically by a script. Don't modify this page by hand, -your changes will just be overwritten the next time the script runs. Talk to your -Friendly Neighborhood Repository Maintainer if you need to change something here. - -}}} - -{{{ -#!html -<h1>libhal</h1> - -<h2>Overview</h2> - -<p>This library combines a set of low-level API functions which talk to -the Cryptech FPGA cores with a set of higher-level functions providing -various cryptographic services.</p> - -<p>There's some overlap between the low-level code here and the low-level -code in core/platform/novena, which will need sorting out some day, -but at the time this library forked that code, the -core/platform/novena code was all written to support a test harness -rather than a higher-level API.</p> - -<p>Current contents of the library:</p> - -<ul> -<li><p>Low-level I/O code (FMC, EIM, and I2C).</p></li> -<li><p>An implementation of AES Key Wrap using the Cryptech AES core.</p></li> -<li><p>An interface to the Cryptech CSPRNG.</p></li> -<li><p>An interface to the Cryptech hash cores, including HMAC.</p></li> -<li><p>An implementation of PBKDF2.</p></li> -<li><p>An implementation of RSA, optionally using the Cryptech ModExp core.</p></li> -<li><p>An implementation of ECDSA, optionally using the Cryptech ECDSA base -point multiplier cores.</p></li> -<li><p>An implementation of HSS/LMS hash-based signatures.</p></li> -<li><p>An interface to the Master Key Memory interface core on the Cryptech -Alpha platform.</p></li> -<li><p>A simple keystore implementation with drivers for RAM and flash -storage on the Cryptech Alpha platform.</p></li> -<li><p>A remote procedure call (RPC) interface.</p></li> -<li><p>(Just enough) ASN.1 code to support a uniform interface to public -(SubjectPublicKeyInformation (SPKI)) and private (PKCS #8) keys.</p></li> -<li><p>A simple key backup mechanism, including a Python script to drive it -from the client side.</p></li> -<li><p>An RPC multiplexer to allow multiple clients (indepedent processes) -to talk to the Cryptech Alpha at once.</p></li> -<li><p>Client implenetations of the RPC mechanism in both C and Python.</p></li> -<li><p>Test code for all of the above.</p></li> -</ul> - -<p>Most of these are fairly well self-contained, although the PBKDF2 -implementation uses the hash-core-based HMAC implementation with -fallback to a software implementation if the cores aren't available.</p> - -<p>The major exceptions are the RSA and ECDSA implementations, which uses -an external bignum implementation (libtfm) to handle a lot of the -arithmetic. In the long run, much or all of this may end up being -implemented in Verilog, but for the moment all of the RSA math except -for modular exponentiation is happening in software, as is all of the -math for ECDSA verification; ECDSA math for key generation and signing -on the P-256 and P-384 curves is done in the ECDSA base point -multiplier cores when those are available.</p> - -<h2>RSA</h2> - -<p>The RSA implementation includes a compile-time option to bypass the -ModExp core and do everything in software, because the ModExp core is -a tad slow at the moment (others are hard at work fixing this).</p> - -<p>The RSA implementation includes optional blinding (enabled by default).</p> - -<h2>ECDSA</h2> - -<p>The ECDSA implementation is specific to the NIST prime curves P-256, -P-384, and P-521.</p> - -<p>The ECDSA implementation includes a compile-time option to allow test -code to bypass the CSPRNG in order to test against known test vectors. -Do <strong>NOT</strong> enable this in production builds, as ECDSA depends on good -random numbers not just for private keys but for individual -signatures, and an attacker who knows the random number used for a -particular signature can use this to recover the private key. -Arguably, this option should be removed from the code entirely.</p> - -<p>The ECDSA software implementation attempts to be constant-time, to -reduce the risk of timing channel attacks. The algorithms chosen for -the point arithmetic are a tradeoff between speed and code complexity, -and can probably be improved upon even in software; reimplementing at -least the field arithmetic in hardware would probably also help. -Signing and key generation performance is significantly better when -the ECDSA base point multiplier cores are available.</p> - -<p>The point addition and point doubling algorithms in the current ECDSA -software implementation come from the <a href="http://www.hyperelliptic.org/EFD/g1p/auto-shortw-jacobian-3.html">EFD</a>. At least at the -moment, we're only interested in ECDSA with the NIST prime curves, so -we use algorithms optimized for a=-3.</p> - -<p>The point multiplication algorithm is a straightforward double-and-add -loop, which is not the fastest possible algorithm, but is relatively -easy to confirm by inspection as being constant-time within the limits -imposed by the NIST curves. Point multiplication could probably be -made faster by using a non-adjacent form (NAF) representation for the -scalar, but the author doesn't understand that well enough to -implement it as a constant-time algorithm. In theory, changing to a -NAF representation could be done without any change to the public API.</p> - -<p>Points stored in keys and curve parameters are in affine format, but -point arithmetic is performed in Jacobian projective coordinates, with -the coordinates themselves in Montgomery form; final mapping back to -affine coordinates also handles the final Montgomery reduction.</p> - -<h2>Hash-Based Signatures</h2> - -<p>A hashsig private key is a Merkle tree of one-time signing keys, which can -be used to sign a finite number of messages. Since they don't rely on -"hard math" for security, hashsig schemes are quantum-resistant.</p> - -<p>This hashsig code is a clean-room implementation of draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs. -It has been shown to interoperate with the Cisco reference code (each can -verify the other's signatures).</p> - -<p>Following the recommendations of the draft, we only store the topmost hash -tree (the "root tree") in the token keystore; lower-level trees are stored -in the volatile keystore, and are regenerated upon a system restart.</p> - -<p>This implementation has limitations on the number of keys, size of OTS -keys, and size of signatures, because of the design of the keystore and of -the RPC mechanism:</p> - -<ol> -<li>The token keystore is a fairly small flash, partitioned into 2048 -8096-byte blocks. Therefore, we can't support LMS algorithm types > -lms_sha256_n32_h10 (a.k.a. h=10, or 1024 keys per tree). In this case, -keygen will return HAL_ERROR_NO_KEY_INDEX_SLOTS.</li> -</ol> - -<p>Additionally, the 8KB key storage size means that we can't support LM-OTS -algorithm type lmots_sha256_n32_w1, which has an OTS key size of 8504 -bytes. In this case, keygen will return HAL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_KEY.</p> - -<ol> -<li><p>The volatile keystore is currently limited to 1280 keys, so only 2 -levels at h=10, but more levels at h=5. One could easily increase the size -of the volatile keystore, but L=2/h=10 gives us a key that can sign 1M -messages, which is sufficient for development and testing purposes.</p></li> -<li><p>The RPC mechanism currently limits request and response messages to -16KB, so we can't generate or verify signatures greater than that size. -In this case, keygen will return HAL_ERROR_UNSUPPORTED_KEY.</p></li> -</ol> - -<p>Because the hashsig private key consists of a large number of one-time -signing keys, and because only the root tree is stored in flash, it can -take several minutes to reconstruct the full tree on system restart. -During this time, attempts to generate a hashsig key, delete a hashsig -key, or sign with a hashsig key will return HAL_ERROR_NOT_READY.</p> - -<p>A hashsig private key can sign at most 2^(L*h) messages. (System restarts -will cause the lower-level trees to be regenerated, which will need to be -signed with by the root tree, so frequent restarts will rapidly exhaust -the root tree.) When a hashsig key is exhausted, any attempt to use it for -signing will return HAL_ERROR_HASHSIG_KEY_EXHAUSTED.</p> - -<h2>Keystore</h2> - -<p>The keystore is basically a light-weight database intended to be run -directly over some kind of block-access device, with an internal -low-level driver interface so that we can use the same API for -multiple keystore devices (eg, flash for "token objects" and RAM for -"session objects", in the PKCS #11 senses of those terms).</p> - -<p>The available storage is divided up into "blocks" of a fixed size; for -simplicity, the block size is a multiple of the subsector size of the -flash chip on the Alpha platform, since that's the minimum erasable -unit. All state stored in the keystore itself follows the conventions -needed for flash devices, whether the device in question is flash or -not. The basic rule here is that one can only clear bits, never set -them: the only way to set a bit is to erase the whole block and start -over. So blocks progress from an initial state ("erased") where all -bits are set to one, through several states where the block contains -useful data, and ending in a state where all bits are set to zero -("zeroed"), because that's the way that flash hardware works.</p> - -<p>The keystore implementation also applies a light-weight form of wear -leveling to all keystore devices, whether they're flash devices or -not. The wear-leveling mechanism is not particularly sophisticated, -but should suffice. The wear-leveling code treats the entirety of a -particular keystore device as a ring buffer of blocks, and keeps track -of which blocks have been used recently by zeroing blocks upon freeing -them rather than erasing them immediately, while also always keeping -the block at the current head of the free list in the erased state. -Taken together, this is enough to recover location of the block at the -head of the free list after a reboot, which is sufficient for a -round-robin wear leveling strategy.</p> - -<p>The block format includes a field for a CRC-32 checksum, which covers -the entire block except for a few specific fields which need to be -left out. On reboot, blocks with bad CRC-32 values are considered -candidates for reuse, but are placed at the end of the free list, -preserve their contents for as long as possible in case the real -problem is a buggy firmware update.</p> - -<p>At the moment, the decision about whether to use the CRC-32 mechanism -is up to the individual driver: the flash driver uses it, the RAM -driver (which never stores anything across reboots anyway) does not.</p> - -<p>Since the flash-like semantics do not allow setting bits, updates to a -block always consist of allocating a new block and copying the -modified data. The keystore code uses a trivial lock-step protocol -for this: first:</p> - -<ol> -<li>The old block is marked as a "tombstone";</li> -<li>The new block (with modified data) is written;</li> -<li>The old block is erased.</li> -</ol> - -<p>This protocol is deliberately as simple as possible, so that there is -always a simple recovery path on reboot.</p> - -<p>Active blocks within a keystore are named by UUIDs. With one -exception, these are always type-4 (random) UUIDs, generated directly -from output of the TRNG. The one exception is the current PIN block, -which always uses the reserved all-zeros UUID, which cannot possibly -conflict with a type-4 UUID (by definition).</p> - -<p>The core of the keystore mechanism is the <code>ks->index[]</code> array, which -contains nothing but a list of block numbers. This array is divided -into two parts: the first part is the index of active blocks, which is -kept sorted (by UUID); the second part is the round-robin free list. -Everything else in the keystore is indexed by these block numbers, -which means that the index array is the only data structure which the -keystore code needs to sort or rotate when adding, removing, or -updating a block. Because the block numbers themselves are small -integers, the index array itself is small enough that shuffling data -within it using <code>memmove()</code> is a relatively cheap operation, which in -turn avoids a lot of complexity that would be involved in managing -more sophisticated data structures.</p> - -<p>The keystore code includes both caching of recently used keystore -blocks (to avoid unnecessary flash reads) and caching of the location -of the block corresponding to a particular UUID (to avoid unnecessary -index searches). Aside from whatever direct performance benefits this -might bring, this also frees the pkey layer that sits directly on top -of the keystore code from needing to keep a lot of active state on -particular keystore objects, which is important given that this whole -thing sits under an RPC protocol driven by a client program which can -impose arbitrary delays between any two operations at the pkey layer.</p> - -<h2>Key backup</h2> - -<p>The key backup mechanism is a straightforward three-step process, -mediated by a Python script which uses the Python client -implementation of the RPC mechanism. Steps:</p> - -<ol> -<li><p>Destination HSM (target of key transfer) generates an RSA keypair, -exports the public key (the "key encryption key encryption key" or -"KEKEK").</p></li> -<li><p>Source HSM (origin of the key transfer) wraps keys to be backed up -using AES keywrap with key encryption keys (KEKs) generated by the -TRNG; these key encryption keys are in turn encrypted with RSA -public key (KEKEK) generated by the receipient HSM.</p></li> -<li><p>Destination HSM receives wrapped keys, unwraps the KEKs using the -KEKEK then unwraps the wrapped private keys.</p></li> -</ol> - -<p>Transfer of the wrapped keys between the two HSMs can be by any -convenient mechanism; for simplicity, <code>cryptech_backup</code> script bundles -everything up in a text file using JSON and Base64 encoding.</p> - -<h2>Multiplexer daemon</h2> - -<p>While the C client library can be built to talk directly to the -Cryptech Alpha board, in most cases it is more convenient to use the -<code>cryptech_muxd</code> multiplexer daemon, which is now the default. Client -code talks to <code>cryptech_muxd</code> via a <code>PF_UNIX</code> socket; <code>cryptech_muxd</code> -handles interleaving of messages between multiple clients, and also -manages access to the Alpha's console port.</p> - -<p>The multiplexer requires two external Python libraries, Tornado -(version 4.0 or later) and PySerial (version 3.0 or later).</p> - -<p>In the long run, the RPC mechanism will need to be wrapped in some -kind of secure channel protocol, but we're not there yet.</p> - -<h2>API</h2> - -<p>Yeah, we ought to document the API, Real Soon Now, perhaps using -<a href="http://www.doxygen.org/">Doxygen</a>. For the moment, see the function prototypes in hal.h, -the Python definitions in cryptech.libhal, and and comments in the -code.</p> -}}} - -[[RepositoryIndex(format=table,glob=sw/libhal)]] - -|| Clone `https://git.cryptech.is/sw/libhal.git` || |