| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DMA is more efficient and less prone to miss characters than interrupts.
An open question is if circular mode is really the best. If someone
copy-pastes more than the RX buffer size of configuration into the CLI,
we risk the DMA controller catching up with the reader and overwriting
data not yet read.
Since we don't have flow control back to the users terminal, we will
always fail if too much data is entered before we can process it. The
question is if failing to stuff new data at the end of a buffer might be
better than data being overwritten - thus messing up the commands in
unpredictable ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committing my work in progress in case someone else wants to help.
|
|
Integrated into the cli-test program as such:
cryptech> test sdram
Initializing SDRAM
Starting SDRAM test (n = 0)
Run sequential write-then-read test for the first chip
Run random write-then-read test for the first chip
Run sequential write-then-read test for the second chip
Run random write-then-read test for the second chip
Run interleaved write-then-read test for both chips at once
SDRAM test (n = 0) completed
SDRAM test completed successfully
cryptech>
|
|
|
