diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | stm-fmc.c | 46 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 18 deletions
@@ -153,7 +153,18 @@ void fmc_init(void) fmc_timing.BusTurnAroundDuration = 0; // use smallest allowed divisor for best performance - fmc_timing.CLKDivision = 2; + // + // FMC_CLK = HCLK / CLKDivision, HCLK is 180 MHz + // + // Allowed values for CLKDivision are integers >= 2. + // + // Division == 2: FMC_CLK = 180 / 2 = 90 MHz (highest allowed frequency) + // Division == 3: FMC_CLK = 180 / 3 = 60 MHz (one step below) + // ... + // + +// fmc_timing.CLKDivision = 2; // 90 MHz + fmc_timing.CLKDivision = 3; // 60 MHz // use min suitable for fastest transfer fmc_timing.DataLatency = 4; @@ -164,22 +175,21 @@ void fmc_init(void) // initialize fmc HAL_SRAM_Init(&_fmc_fpga_inst, &fmc_timing, NULL); - // STM32 only enables FMC clock right before the very first read/write - // access. FPGA takes certain time (<= 100 us) to lock its PLL to this frequency, - // so a certain number of initial FMC transactions may be missed. One read transaction - // takes ~0.1 us (9 ticks @ 90 MHz), so doing 1000 dummy reads will make sure, that FPGA - // has already locked its PLL and is ready. Another way around is to repeatedly read - // some register that is guaranteed to have known value until reading starts returning - // correct data. + // STM32 only enables FMC clock right before the very first read/write + // access. FPGA takes certain time (<= 100 us) to lock its PLL to this frequency, + // so a certain number of initial FMC transactions may be missed. One read transaction + // takes ~0.1 us (9 ticks @ 90 MHz), so doing 1000 dummy reads will make sure, that FPGA + // has already locked its PLL and is ready. Another way around is to repeatedly read + // some register that is guaranteed to have known value until reading starts returning + // correct data. - // to prevent compiler from optimizing this away, we pretent we're calculating sum - int cyc; - uint32_t sum; - volatile uint32_t part; - - for (cyc=0; cyc<1000; cyc++) - { - part = *(__IO uint32_t *)FMC_FPGA_BASE_ADDR; - sum += part; - } + // to prevent compiler from optimizing this away, we pretent we're calculating sum + int cyc; + uint32_t sum; + volatile uint32_t part; + + for (cyc = 0; cyc < 1000; cyc++) { + part = *(__IO uint32_t *)FMC_FPGA_BASE_ADDR; + sum += part; + } } |