diff options
author | Pavel V. Shatov (Meister) <meisterpaul1@yandex.ru> | 2020-01-21 15:46:06 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pavel V. Shatov (Meister) <meisterpaul1@yandex.ru> | 2020-01-22 14:32:23 +0300 |
commit | fbf287f57879678fe8cf4a74e07e72ca5c7b153b (patch) | |
tree | dd3f7b0182e543023306d152b2b15cba81bb17e3 /xdc/alpha_fmc_pinout.xdc | |
parent | d6f47a422d1e41edb7b25b83e81931a19efd7ff0 (diff) |
This commit turns off the "equivalent_register_removal" setting for XST.
Okay, here's the story. Xilinx synthesis tool ("XST") is smart in the sense,
that it detects all the registers with equivalent behaviour and then removes
all of them, but one, and connects all loads to this one flip-flop. This works
fine most of the time and usually even saves some resources, but for our
particular design it was starting to cause just too many problems.
The reason is that ModExp* cores exploit the parallel nature of an FPGA,
for example, the ModExpNG instantiates four copies of the modular multiplier
internally. Those multipliers all operate the same way (but on different data,
of course), so all their internal signals such as, say, clock enables and word
counters are the same. XST happily throws away all the internals from three
multipliers, leaves only one instance of control signals and then the map and
place&route tools start struggling for hours fusing this all together. Turning
off equivalent register removal entirely leads to excessive resource
consumption, so the optimal solution would be to selectively turn it off only
for those tricky places where several copies of control signals are actually
required to meet timing. The problem is that according to Xilinx' docs (UG687
v14.5, p. 363) "quivalent_register_removal = no" inline constraint can be
applied to entire modules, not only individual registers, but I was unable to
get this to work, XST seems to just ignore it. This may have been fixed in
Vivado though, haven't tried yet.
Another potential solution is to prepend every register declaration inside the
modular multiplier with this constraint, but that would look just ugly. One
trick I've seen somewhere is to `define a new 'keep_equivalent_reg' "keyword"
to be '"quivalent_register_removal = no" reg' and tweak register declarations
accordingly, that seems to looks somewhat less ugly, don't know.
Yet another way around might be to use the "max_fanout" constraint instead.
Say there're eight DSP slices per multiplier (thirty two DSP slices total since
there're four multiplier instances). In theory we can constrain their clock
enable fanout to not exceed 8. The problem is that XST will first throw away
three of the clock enables, and then gradually add them back to limit each
clock enable fanout to 8. This way there's no guarantee, that the first clock
enable will be routed to all the eight DSP slices in the first multiplier, it
can be routed to DSP slices in the three remaining multipliers as well, since
XST will try to just limit the fanout. It's difficult to predict how the
place&route tools will handle this.
Anyways, the current slice consumption with 2x ModExpA7 and 1x ModExpNG is ~40%,
and the timing situation is very good (the very first phase of place and
route already has zero setup time violations, yay!). With global equivalent
register removal turned on, utilization drops to ~35%, but timing is impossible
to meet even on the highest map and place&route effort setting. I believe the
best way forward is to just keep global removal disabled for now. We may
revisit this in the future, say, if we decide to generate a custom dedicated
RSA-only signer bitstream with as many core instances as possible. Then every
register will count, but I suspect we won't get away with just re-enabling
global equivalent register removal alone, likely some floorplanning will be
required too at least.
Diffstat (limited to 'xdc/alpha_fmc_pinout.xdc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions