From 19e4044fcf47360dcc5aa68f6eae5a62a6cdb61b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Austein Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 13:21:01 -0400 Subject: Sorted out reset pins (I think). Seems our various core authors have different opinions about whether reset should be high or low, and the core selector code is responsible for making this right. Hmm. Address map may still be wrong, as addressing scheme seems to have changed while the core_select branch was gathering dust. --- config/core_selector.v | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'config/core_selector.v') diff --git a/config/core_selector.v b/config/core_selector.v index 4debd60..731b494 100644 --- a/config/core_selector.v +++ b/config/core_selector.v @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ module core_selector board_regs board_regs_inst ( .clk(sys_clk), - .reset_n(~sys_rst), + .rst(sys_rst), .cs(enable_board_regs & (sys_eim_rd | sys_eim_wr)), .we(sys_eim_wr), @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ module core_selector comm_regs comm_regs_inst ( .clk(sys_clk), - .reset_n(~sys_rst), + .rst(sys_rst), .cs(enable_comm_regs & (sys_eim_rd | sys_eim_wr)), .we(sys_eim_wr), -- cgit v1.2.3